WELFARE REFORM
To talk about any kind of
welfare is polemical. Why? Because, in any situation, there will be someone
with bad intentions. These people can be the beneficiaries or the politicians.
In the USA, the program of
food stamps does not necessarily waste the government resources because, in
fact, most people really need that benefit. Nevertheless, a few beneficiaries
are dishonest and take more welfare cards than they should.
In another case, an
American politician argued that people spend their welfare in drugs and
proposed a bill against this kind of behavior. However, it is not because a
person is poor that he is necessarily going to use drugs. But, despite that,
there are people that do that.
When we see cases like
these, it is not impossible remember of “bolsa família” in Brazil and in its positive and negative effects and we always
ask to ourselves: how long these people will live just with that welfare and if
they are happy with this situation. After all whose fault is it?
A charge não me parece que funciona como analogia perfeita, pois no caso dos programas assistenciais os beneficiários sabem "nadar", mas não têm condições de fazê-lo, por inúmeras razões, daí a importância vital da "bóia"...
ResponderExcluir